Multiples Won't Bail Out Private Equity Anymore. Operations Must.

The EBITDA growth bar has doubled. Can your portfolio see it?

🧭 a16z Just Asked If Private Equity Is Cooked

On November 4, Andreessen Horowitz partner Jen Kha published an essay with a blunt title: "Is Private Equity Cooked?"

Her answer is not that buyouts are dead. It's that the formula that carried the 2010s has stopped working.

According to Bain, as cited in the essay, a typical 2015 buyout needed about 5% a year of EBITDA growth to make 2.5x in five years, with rising multiples doing much of the work. Kha estimates the same deal today needs 10% to 12%.

Meanwhile, the growth is slowing. Golub Capital, one of the biggest lenders to PE-backed companies, saw its software borrowers go from 9% revenue growth to under 3% in two years, per the essay.

Kha's verdict on the last decade: "Put bluntly, falling rates and a flood of new money likely bailed out a lot of deals."

Here's the catch. Nobody is coming to bail out the next one. The return now has to be built inside the portfolio, one operating decision at a time.

And most funds can't see their portfolio clearly enough to make those decisions fast.

Multiple expansion stalls while returns must be climbed through operations

A note from the team behind this newsletter: we are building OpenMap, The Agent Network, the connective tissue for the world's AI agents, starting with every person and every local business. We are raising a £5M seed. Meet us at openmap.ai/investors.

OpenMap: We are building The Agent Network. We're raising a £5M seed. Invest in OpenMap.

💡 From Multiple Expansion to Operating Truth

For a decade, the exit multiple was the quiet partner in every deal.

Buy at 12x. Sell at 15x. Cheap debt in between. Even a flat business could look like a winner.

That partner has left the room.

Now the return has to come from things you can actually point to: revenue that grows, margins that widen, costs that come out and stay out.

The painful truth: EBITDA growth is the only lever left, and you can't pull a lever you can't see.

🔍 Why Value Creation Plans Keep Missing

Every value creation plan starts with a confident slide. Pricing up two points. Churn down. Procurement savings across the platform.

Then the quarter starts, and the operating team spends it chasing data.

One company tracks churn by logo, another by revenue. Gross margin includes freight in one business and excludes it next door. The pricing analysis needs CRM data, billing data and contract terms that live in three different systems.

By the time the numbers line up, the window to act has closed.

So funds reach for AI to speed things up. And the AI answers confidently from the same fragmented data.

This isn't a growth problem. It's a context problem.

When you need twice the EBITDA growth, you can't afford to spend half the hold period reconciling spreadsheets.

⚙️ How It Works: One Live View of Every Value Lever

PrivateEquities.AI gives your fund one connected, always current view of the portfolio, so every value creation decision starts from numbers everyone already trusts.

  1. Connect, Don't Collect
    The platform plugs into the systems your portfolio companies already run: CRMs, ERPs, data rooms, warehouses and BI tools. No data migration. No integration project per company.

  2. One Context Graph
    Customers, contracts, pricing and margins are linked across the portfolio, so churn, margin and EBITDA mean the same thing in every company.

  3. Agents on Top
    ProfileAI, CleanseAI and other in-house agents validate data and harmonize formats before a figure reaches a pricing model, a board pack or an LP update.

  4. Always Live
    When a source system changes, the graph updates. You see a margin slipping this month, not after the quarter closes.

Portfolio company systems connected into one live context graph

📊 Value Creation: Before and After Context

Old World

New World

Returns lean on the exit multiple

Returns built from measurable EBITDA growth

Value plans tracked in quarterly slides

Every lever tracked from live portfolio data

Each company defines churn and margin its own way

One definition across the fund

Operating teams spend weeks reconciling inputs

Inputs validated before anyone acts on them

AI answers from whatever data it can find

AI answers tied back to source systems

The deal is the same. How fast you can find the growth inside it is what changes.

💸 Every Wasted AI Dollar Comes Out of EBITDA

When the multiple won't rescue you, cost discipline matters at every line. That includes the AI bill.

Portfolio companies are running more AI every month: summarizing contracts, tagging invoices, drafting sales emails, answering support tickets.

Run all of it on a premium model and you're quietly spending margin you now need.

The PrivateEquities.AI Inference Cost Calculator shows up to a 35x price gap between frontier and open-weight model classes for the same workload.

A frontier model reviewing a complex pricing contract may be worth it. The same model routing support tickets is not.

The capital is committed. The overpay is optional.

Matching routine AI tasks to the right model class to protect EBITDA

🧩 A Day in the Life of an Operating Partner Using PrivateEquities.AI

8:00 AM - The Headline
You read that a typical deal now needs 10% to 12% EBITDA growth to hit its target. You open the context graph and check where each portfolio company actually stands against its plan.

10:30 AM - Finding the Gap
Three companies are on track. One is behind on pricing because discounts never reached the billing system. Another reports margin on a definition nobody else uses.

2:00 PM - Fixing the Inputs
The agents flag the discount leak and harmonize the margin definition. The pricing fix goes to the CEO with numbers the CFO already agrees with.

5:00 PM - Protecting the Margin
Contract review stays on a frontier model. Routine ticket routing moves to a cheaper class, and the saving shows up in this month's EBITDA bridge.

That's how conviction compounds.

"Tech buyout is a late-cycle asset class."
Jen Kha, Andreessen Horowitz, via a16z

Late in the cycle, the operators win. And operators run on data they can trust.

🚀 Ready to Find the Growth Hiding in Your Portfolio?

If your value creation plan still depends on a dozen disconnected systems and a month of reconciliation, the math just got harder.

PrivateEquities.AI helps funds turn portfolio chaos into operating clarity.

👉 Book a Demo
See how connected context puts every value creation lever on one live view.

👉 Run the Inference Cost Calculator
Find out what your portfolio is overpaying for AI.

🔔 Key Takeaways

  1. The Bar Has Doubled. A 2015 buyout needed about 5% yearly EBITDA growth to make 2.5x. Kha estimates today's needs 10% to 12%.

  2. Growth Is Slowing. Golub's software borrowers fell from 9% revenue growth to under 3% in two years.

  3. Multiples Won't Rescue Deals. The returns of the next cycle have to be earned in operations.

  4. Context Comes First. You can't run a value creation plan on numbers that mean different things in every company.

  5. Cut the Overpay. Matching AI tasks to the right model class protects the EBITDA you're working to build.

🧠 Final Thought

The funds that thrive after the easy decade won't be the ones that bought best. They'll be the ones that can see, every day, where the growth is hiding inside what they already own.

PrivateEquities.AI is making that possible.

Warm regards,